Ohjaus:
Ingmar BergmanKäsikirjoitus:
Ingmar BergmanKuvaus:
Sven NykvistSävellys:
Rolf A. WilhelmNäyttelijät:
David Carradine, Liv Ullmann, Gert Fröbe, Heinz Bennent, James Whitmore, Edith Heerdegen, Christian Berkel, Walter Schmidinger, Ralf Wolter (lisää)Juonikuvaukset(1)
Mestariohjaaja Ingmar Bergman tutkii 1920-luvun saksan kauhuja, luoden vertaistaan hakevan maanpäällisen helvetin psykologisessa trillerissä, jonka tähtikaarti hypnotisoi katsojan pahuuden pauloihin. Työtön trapetsitaiteilija Abel Rosenberg (David Carradine) selviää vuoden 1923 Berliinin surrealistisessa sirkuksessa viinan voimin. Silti – jopa tokkuraisen horroksensa läpi – hän erottaa järkyttävän arvoituksen. Kaikki hänen tuntemansa ihmiset – kaukaisimmatkin tuttavat – kuolevat väkivaltaisesti. Selviääkö hän itse... vai tuhoutuuko hänen mielensä ja sielunsa? (SF Film Fin.)
(lisää)Videot (1)
Arvostelut (1)
An existential psychological drama infused with the essence of Franz Kafka and German expressionism, but at the same time, a dark noir with an almost perfectly captured atmosphere of Weimar Germany, plagued by the aftermath of a lost war, economic crisis, political instability, and the decadence of a cynical and sexually provocative cultural scene. For many viewers, The Serpent's Egg will represent a difficult-to-digest challenge. For fans of the genre, Bergman's cinematic language and ambiguous, almost hallucinogenic storytelling will pose a great obstacle. Admirers of Bergman will miss his typical signature style and, in addition, will tend to perceive The Serpent's Egg as an unacceptable commercial transgression by the Master. I admit without reservation that the artsy masturbation of Bergman's psychological dramas has never attracted me, except for rare exceptions, and I have actually been consistently avoiding his films for many years. However, here I felt that it perfectly matched my taste and mood. The film only missed earning a fifth star for two reasons. I don't mind David Carradine even though I typecast him as an action and kung fu movie star since I have never been a fan of that genre, so no association works for me. What bothers me is that he simply doesn't meet the demanding requirements of the role. He is more of a type actor, and when it comes to multidimensional character acting, he falls short. And secondly, Bergman sometimes exaggerates the expressiveness to the point of hysteria. However, the atmosphere of the film works flawlessly, and I thoroughly enjoyed the excellent camera work. In my opinion, the combination of Hollywood and Bergman turned out better than expected. Overall impression: 85%. ()