S.W.A.T.
Ohjaus:
Clark JohnsonKuvaus:
Gabriel BeristainSävellys:
Elliot GoldenthalNäyttelijät:
Samuel L. Jackson, Colin Farrell, Michelle Rodriguez, Jeremy Renner, Olivier Martinez, Reg E. Cathey, Reed Diamond, Lucinda Jenney, Jay Acovone (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (2)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
SWAT -ryhmä on poliisien eliittiosasto joka kutsutaan apuun, kun muut lainvartijat tarvitsevat apua mahdottomissa tilanteissa.
SWAT sai alkunsa vuonna 1967 kun Los Angelesiin tarvittiin erikoisosaamista mellakoiden järjestykseen saamisessa.
Jim Street (Colin Farrell) ja työparinsa Gamble ovat SWATin, eli Los Angelesin poliisin erikoisjoukoissa. Etenkin Gamble ottaa riskejä ja tekee omia päätöksiä. Pankkiryöstön aikana hän ampuu panttivankia pelastaakseen tämän hengen tilanteessa jossa käskettiin odottaa. Ylikomisario ei hyväksy Streetin ja Gamblen toimintaa ja erottaa heidät SWATista ja panee töihin asevarikolle. Gamble ei suostu, mutta Street jää odottamaan tilaisuutta päästä takaisin. Se tulee, kun vanha konkari Hondo (Samuel L. Jackson) tulee kokoamaan uutta nuorta tiimiä SWATiin. Hondo kouluttaa uuden tiiminsä, joka joutuu tositoimiin kun kansainvälinen rikollinen aiotaan siirtää vankilaan. Hän on luvannut julkisesti 100 miljoonaa dollaria sille, joka vapauttaa hänet...
(Nordisk Film Fin.)
Videot (2)
Arvostelut (6)
S.W.A.T. has one significant flaw, it is impossible to empathize with the main characters. The direction is decent, as well as the action and editing. There are a few very interesting twists and well edited action scenes, but the distinctiveness of the individual characters is minimal. Overall, it comes across as a fast-paced intelligent action thriller that won't offend anyone, but personally, I was expecting a little bit more.
()
A routine action flick with minimal action and without a shred of style or creative touch. Would-be sophisticated characters, would-be cool humor, zero suspense. And a bad guy who seems to still be lying in bed with Diane Lane. In what way did the makers of this film want to appeal to viewers?
()
Way too much unnecessary fluff for my taste, which reduces some scenes almost to a joke. One of David Ayer's weakest scripts ever, this time unfortunately drowning in clichés, infantilism, and flagrantly unbelievable characters. But if you put the childishness aside and just don't worry about it, you get a pretty brisk action ride with a heap of stellar acting. But the entire stellar cast comes across as self-indulgent at the very least, given the shallowness and superficiality of the entire film.
()
Unexpectedly pleasant surprise that reaches for five stars with its non-standard concept and interesting action. To receive it, S.W.A.T would need a little drop of unforgettable experience, otherwise it may be categorized as a team action crime movie. However, the excitement still prevails, because I haven't seen such a well-assembled unit for a long time. The suffocating atmosphere, inventive action, brisk editing, and very confident direction indicated the direction for action movies of the new millennium, but the producers clearly haven't heard it. Such a shame. 90%
()
Dr Interesting and Mr Average came together in one film and the result is S.W.A.T. No, I'm not talking about the actors, but the first and second half of the film. The opening action scene and the recruiting and training of the rookies were fun, brisk and well filmed, but the climactic action set-piece with the escape of the main villain was too routine, with only the snail's pace of the jet taking off being unintentionally amusing. Still, overall, I can't say I was disappointed because I always enjoy the natural acting and charisma of Colin Farrell and Samuel L. Jackson.
()
Kuvagalleria (78)
Kuva © 2003 Columbia Pictures
Mainos