Juonikuvaukset(1)

Erika Kohut on wieniläisen konservatorion keski-ikäinen pianonopettaja, joka iästään huolimatta asuu yhä vaateliaan ja hallitsevan äitinsä luona. Erika elää eristettynä ja kärsii seksuaalisesta alistamisesta, joka ilmenee voyeurismina ja sadomasokistisina fetisseinä, kuten itsetypistyksenä. Kun nuori insinööriopiskelija pyrkii konservatorioon, kaksikko tykästyy toisiinsa. (Soulmedia Fin.)

(lisää)

Arvostelut (4)

POMO 

kaikki käyttäjän arvostelut

englanti A heavy psychological film about sexual obsessions that won’t give you a clear, satisfying answer to anything, but you definitely won’t forget it. ()

gudaulin 

kaikki käyttäjän arvostelut

englanti Michael Haneke does not make pleasant and beautiful films, but rather unsettling dramas that injure and leave behind a strange aftertaste. However, or perhaps precisely because of this, it is not a bad film. It portrays a possibly not widely spread, yet realistically existing world of sexual deviances of people distorted by constant pretending, secrecy, and unfulfilled desires. It is definitely a more realistic view of a certain aspect of eroticism and interpersonal relationships than Shortbus, which I recently watched. Moreover, the film has excellent performances, led by Isabelle Huppert. She excels in her role as a psychopathic teacher. If something bothers me about the film, it is the excessively long duration. Some scenes are unnecessary and others are drawn out. Overall impression: 80%. ()

NinadeL 

kaikki käyttäjän arvostelut

englanti Elfriede Jelinek's work is better known outside the wave of interest generated by the Nobel Prize. Enough time has gone by at this point. But it's hard to imagine the buzz generated around this art film without a connection to the buzz around the Nobel Prize. It's cyclical, which is actually a shame. The Piano Teacher deals with topics that should be discussed but are not. It is fascinating that something as simple as a mother-daughter relationship can turn into something so complicated and devastating. ()

kaylin 

kaikki käyttäjän arvostelut

englanti I definitely do not consider myself - nor can I consider myself - an expert on Michael Haneke, but I think I can confidently say that he is one of my favorite directors. And that's after only seeing three of his films. The first one was "Funny Games," which I must admit left me quite disappointed. What he dared to do at the end was something extra that simply didn't belong there. Why? Similar script interventions are usually detrimental, unless you're Charlie Kaufman. The second film, on the other hand, truly impressed me. It was, of course, the Oscar-winning "Amour." A film that leaves you with incredibly deep emotions. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2013/02/pianistka-2001-85.html ()