Apinoiden planeetan vallankumous

A few minutes of over-digitalized introduction suggests that the second instalment bet on a completely different horse than the first part, where digital monkeys complemented an emotionally charged and dramaturgically sensitive story about people and the place of animals in the human world (and vice versa). It was a cleanly made film in the Spielberg tradition. The second film drowns in digital effects, is action-packed and, following the current trends set by Nolan, visually dark. Which in itself might not hurt if all of its characters had a meaningful place in the story and if it didn’t provoke emotions with cheap sentiment. I really expected more from Matt Reeves than a mere flashy but empty blockbuster. (16.10.2014)

This time there’s no CGI in the service of perfectly crafted emotions, honest monkey looks, and precise directorial construction of a simple plot, as Reeves sees the film's basic thrust on the exact opposite spectrum of blockbuster rules. Work with the characters is at zero, and plot predictability is at the max. As the minutes ticked by, I honestly felt so bad for every moment I guessed in advance that I wanted to turn in my movie ticket and get my money back. Fail of the year. (27.07.2014)

Dense, emotionally very rich, layered, fun and charming work with effects and "inhuman" protagonists, who take most of the space from their counterparts made of flesh and bones, which we simply don’t get to see that much (a slightly "sketched" Oldman, for example). Reeves has a more distinctive style than Wyatt, and it must be said that the use of long steady cam rides or a static camera in a few larger action sets is very refreshing, while giving the world of Planet of the Apes a prudence that goes beyond frenetic blockbusters. The tricks do not act as a self-serving tool for arousing astonishment, but rather as a deft means of characterizing characters with limited ability to express themselves verbally. In the same way, the action forms part of a compact and intertwined whole, which is characterized by surprisingly sensitive work with a detail of a monkey's face (not only a symbolically mirrored introduction and conclusion), but the film is brought down a bit by some partial clumsiness in the narrative. The film does not focus on simply entertaining, but truly strives to create a functioning universe, the possibilities of which deepen with each film. Also exciting is the way in which it "distributes" sympathy for "non-people" and makes them the bearers of our own historical dilemmas and failures (Caesar and Koba - sic! - as two faces of the revolution and the effort to create a functioning community). That's why Planet of the Apes is currently the most interesting "running" blockbuster series and Dawn of the Planet of the Apes is a film that stands out enough in this year's fierce competition to call it the best high-budget affair thus far. For me, it’s even a bit more convincing than the first film. [90%] (14.07.2014)

People. Apes. Hominids. Mammals. Scum. Everybody. Speak. Lots. CGI. Lots. Blockbuster. Thought. Seemingly. Superficial. Black and white. Too simple. Half-assed. First. Better. Suspense. Subliminal. Silence. Storm. Sequel. Different. Very. Overtone. Current. Inevitability. Pretend. Worse. No. Better. Different... And as a bonus to the short-spoken speech of animals, you get the origin of the shrew legal loophole in the apish lawbook committed on Rambo the Ape. (16.07.2014)

Ape not kill ape. The stunning impression from Rise of the Planet of the Apes remains unmatched, but the sequel does not embarrass the apes, quite the opposite. It is only the world of Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, where heroes and flawed characters exist on both sides of the barricade, that feels very real and convincingly enough that instead of offering an action-packed and dramatic spectacle, it provides a rather depressing spectacle. However, there is still plenty of room for superbly executed intense moments, which once again unsurprisingly belong to the majestic Caesar. I am slowly losing confidence in how many installments this saga can withstand, but if it really continues under the helm of Matt Reeves, my concerns will quickly disappear. (24.07.2014)

Ten winters have passed since the events in part one and apes haven’t seen humans for a good few years. But the idyll that Caesar build in the jungle away from the city is to come to an end when man enters his territory. Slow building of relationships and introduction of heroes prove to be worth it in the more warring second half. When Koba gets to work with his gun. The ape gang led by Andy Serkis comes across more realistically than last time and so we should say a few words about the excellent acting performances. Kebbell’s Koba is awesome. The human rabble is concentrated around Clarke’s family and even though they fade a little beside their ape brothers, they are still really fine. I was surprised about Gary Oldman’s appearance. He isn’t given much room. Excellent narration from Reeves on a conversational level, but he’s also at home in warring situations. The attacks by the apes and one-to-one combat are original and powerful (especially the scene with the armored transporter and the rotating turmoil of battle) with precise special effect sequences. The ruins of San Francisco is a feast for the eyes too. I’m happy. Apes do not kill apes. (24.07.2014)

A sequel that is neither grander, nor more action-packed or more spectacular than its predecessor. It continues in a very generic manner and the conflict between the two species is portrayed quite narrowly (one city versus one clan of apes in the forest). Nevertheless, it is a decently done work with a good cast and captivating visual effects, which are beautiful and not just for the sake of it – the CGI successfully manages to evoke various types of emotions in the viewers. There are plenty of tearful scenes, but the truly moving ones make up barely fifty percent. Minimal action, but dense psychology and it certainly won't offend the intelligence of the audience. However, I consider this trend as something expected from the first installment and, despite all the positives, the second installment did not move beyond that. (18.07.2014)

The best possible sequel that Rise of the Planet of the Apes could have gotten. I probably wouldn't have noticed the change in directors (Reeves, like Wyatt, has a lot of ideas, now and then he entertains with a longer take, and the atmosphere is perfect), but Michael Giacchino composed even better music than Patrick Doyle... And Caesar in particular has changed. He's aged, he's gotten wiser and it's all perfectly evident in the first shot. As a character, he's well fleshed out, a proper hero as he should be, and so are his family members. In short, it's clear that the writers cared as much about the monkeys as (or more than) the humans, and they succeeded. Once again I was impressed by the special effects team, and the film has momentum, an idea, it gradually builds up, and the ending is bombastic. I wonder what we'll see next. I would have preferred if the third part had taken place after ten winters, not directly following the prior events and preferably without people at all. But that's just an audacious wish. (19.07.2014)

I’m enjoying the development that the trilogy is going through so far, both in form and content. From an emotional human blockbuster with a distinctive auteur story to a bleak post-apocalyptic vision shrouded in dark colours and an insistent sense of impending conflict. The story itself is admittedly more or less generic and, with its clearly defined ideas and roughly sketched characters, it’s accessible even to the least perceptive patient of a Polio ward, but the experience stemming from the unearthly CGI and the gradual escalation of the seemingly controllable situation is nevertheless extremely engaging and, thanks to the atmospheric charge, this time the considerably more violent action scenes are as intense (albeit in a different, cheaper sense) as in the first film. Evil and good may have been clearly defined since from the moment they enter the stage, but their motivations remain so strong, logical and fateful that they far outweigh the unsurprising consequences of their actions... The visuals are truly fantastic, there are lots over-the-top sequences, and the scene of the year.. An incredibly very strong 4*. (28.07.2014)

And did you know that chimpanzees are the only animal, other than humans, who look into the face of a female during coitus? Not the female their doing it with, but still. The monkeys in Dawn of the Planet of the Apes don't have sex, of course, because they have nothing to have sex with, given that sewing digital dicks onto pissed-off monkeys would probably make the whole revolution too phallic, and that, of course, wouldn't make this movie's horribly adult parable work; and besides, Caesar's old lady is also worryingly flat and there’s generally nothing to grab onto, so we simply have to accept that we're watching yet another Hollywood compromise that tries to look as serious as pneumonia. And as a result, I bit quite a few nails in the first hour and a half. While the first installment grazed on the attraction of a CGI humanized monkey, the second identifies the exact same thing as its main asset, only multiplied by more monkeys. It's still cool, it works (though we still have to be able to tell the monkey protagonists apart with scars or different ape species), but it's not enough. And combined with the human characters, of which there are I think 12 (speaking) in the film and they could all be shrunk down into two, all that's left is to beg for mercy during the final climax. Which fortunately works very well, the tank scene is an absolute gem, as is Jason Clarke running through the human base being looted by apes with the thoroughness of a Liberian liberator. The final fight delights with the length of its shots and its use of long shots, which makes sense as it was all conceived in the comp, and I have to give the formal and directorial qualities a nod with four stars in the end. However, if you go to the movies for the story and you're over fifteen, good luck. (05.11.2014)

In the beginning, I was a bit bothered by the fact that there are a lot of digital tricks in there and they are simply not as perfect as the creators would like, but when it was only about monkeys and no other animals, it was very bearable. Especially because this is not a classic blockbuster, but this movie simply has a deeper meaning. The ideas presented here are great. One of the most interesting studies of human society that has reached a large number of people in an interesting and entertaining way at first sight. Hopefully, even those who view it as a simple spectacle will reflect on it. That movie is not like that. (27.07.2014)