Bron
Broen
TV-sarjan luojat:
Hans RosenfeldtNäyttelijät:
Sofia Helin, Kim Bodnia, Thure Lindhardt, Rafael Pettersson, Sarah Boberg, Dag Malmberg, Puk Scharbau, Lars Simonsen, Gabriel Flores Jair (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (1)
Kaudet(4) / Jaksot(38)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
Nainen löytyy murhattuna keskeltä Öresundin siltaa, aivan Ruotsin ja Tanskan rajalta. molempien maiden poliisi kutsutaan paikalle ja pian selviää, että uhreja ei olekaan yksi, vaan kaksi. Heidän ruumiinsa on jaettu kahtia ja koottu taas yhdeksi. Järisyttävä kaksoismurha on vasta alkua väkivallan aallolle, jollaista kukaan ei ole nähnyt aiemmin. Ruotsin ja Tanskan poliisille tämä on kilpajuoksu aikaa ja ylivoimaista vihollista vastaan. (Scanbox Entertainment Fin.)
(lisää)Videot (4)
Arvostelut (7)
The essence of Scandi crime series with all the essential trimmings. The pluses include the dark and dismal atmosphere, its focus on the characters, exceptional uncompromising nature and social crossover in the form of a (seemingly) socially aware culprit. The minuses include the character of the unerring murderer and the primary the bane of most Scandi crime series, it’s needlessly over-complicated. And over-complicated in spite of a certain transparency of plot; in this case often several episodes in advance. It doesn’t take away anything from the whole show, but it’s annoying. What in the end makes this more than a mere, darn good genre piece is the central duo, who deserve to be serenaded with odes and it’s hard to decide whether it’s better written or acted, and they alone could make much worse series than The Bridge work excellently. The same applies, word for word, for season two as for season one; both the pluses and the minuses. It’s just that here they follow the rules of a continuation “about more and on a bigger scale". It runs the same course, has the same style, theme and structure, just in the guise of a new case. Especially the backstories are almost one to one in terms of type. Whether or not this is a(n) (dis)advantage depends on what you expect from it. Even so, in the end it is sufficiently unique not to come across like some cowardly sticking to tried and tested formulae. Again and mainly thanks to the characters; and this time it isn’t just the central duo, although they are still peerless (not only) in this genre. | S1: 5/5 | S2: 4/5 |
()
Because I like to begin my reviews with flowery journalistic language, I can’t allow myself to characterise The Bridge as a series that will give you a chill. Not only with the coldness of the inhospitable environment, framed with chillingly perfect camerawork, but also the coldness of the interpersonal relationships. Though detailed psychological depictions do not play the lead role in the narrative, it is clear from the beginning that there will be no grand declarations of love or heart-rending embraces, which helps to highlight the fact that the one who is sick is not just the wanted killer, but also the society that produced him. In my opinion, Saga Norén is the most convincingly written and acted character with Asperger’s syndrome that I have seen so far, as she is an embodiment of that emotional impassivity. Thanks to her extraordinary scrupulousness, which sharply contrasts with the greater moral flexibility (and thus greater humanity) of the other characters, the series maintains a sense of detachment and never becomes so serious that it would start to be ridiculous (like Luther). At the same time, however, there is no exaggeration of the protagonist’s affliction or excessive effort to balance her inability to empathise against her brilliance as an investigator. Saga is fully devoted only to her work, from which she allows herself to be distracted only when she needs to satisfy some of her basic physical needs. Besides Saga, I found that the main value added of The Bridge is its attempt to present the killer’s deviant ideas in a more ambivalent package by placing them in a broader social context. At the conclusion of the series, its creators unfortunately turn away from diagnosing so-called advanced western societies toward personal traumas and very shallow motivations, which rather diminishes the plausibility of the plot (or perhaps I am merely underestimating the determination of Scandinavian sociopaths). However, I consider the expansion of the scope of the standard investigation to include what is happening in the globalised world to be a clever screenwriting move, as it leads us to assess smaller conflicts also from a macro-perspective. But the bold “from micro to macro and back” narrative structure also causes some outwardly important characters to serve solely for the purpose of drawing attention to more of the bad things happening in the world today (making of BDSM porn), after which they are removed from the scene. Just as the killer’s real motivation does not organically pervade the whole series and mainly seems to be the result of an attempt at an unexpected twist, the investigation itself develops in an oddly stumbling manner. It comes across as a series of partial revelations that are not closely interconnected, and the investigation actually starts over several times. Rather than it being overwrought, I would thus say that it has an inconsistent combination of individual motifs. The loose narrative is held together especially by the icy visual style, which affords no space for warmer colours, and the contrasting pair of investigators, of whom particularly Saga is a strong enough motivation for me to watch the second season. 80%
()
(vähemmän)
(lisää)
The Bridge is an extremely precise genre spectacle in every respect. But in that lies my sole criticism of it. The screenwriting concept and genre focus are too obvious throughout the narrative with the eccentric duo of investigators, the interconnection of the case with the social issues of the day, the criminal genius and his elaborate plan, and ultimately the premise itself, which makes it clear that this is a Scandinavian co-production. Though in principle it is unfair to compare all Scandinavian crime productions to the ground-breaking The Killing (which of course was far from being the first internationally successful title of its genre; see Unit One, for example). But it is quite evident that The Bridge comes from the same dramaturgical roots and would like to have the same effect. Because of its exceedingly obvious contrivance, it will always remain “just” a genre series and will never be able to measure up to the complexity and emotional and ethical impact of The Killing, especially its climactic third season.
()
I am writing this review after finishing the first series but at the same time I am also in the middle of the second series already which is no worse and is actually based on the exact same idea. The essence of the story is that there is a corpse on the European’s longest bridge between two countries. And since the corpse was found on the territory of two countries, one eccentric Swedish female detective and one also eccentric male Danish detective are in charge of the investigation. The best part is that they are both weathered by life and they both have their own lives with their own rules, addictions, problems and sufferings. Basically they are just normal people like all of us and it is up to the viewer if he likes them or not. But there is a breaking point during the investigation because there are not only scenes from the investigation but gradually some stories from detectives’ personal lives as well. Sofia Helin and Kim Bodnia are by the way excellent in their roles. You won’t find a couple of detectives who would be more natural and at the same time more distinctive than anybody else from for example any US crime series. The European production is much better in this aspect and it’s great that the Northerners used this to their advantage. With a mysterious Nordic atmosphere, which is underlined by a brilliant camera that focuses on Scandinavian austerity in architecture, this series simply cannot disappoint you.
()
1st series: For lovers of "over-twisted" and socially conscious Nordic detective stories, this is something like a luxury chocolate shop. Although the series follows the model of an American thriller on thematic crime, it of course translates it into the Nordic value system and perceives it in the context of social phenomena - the mysterious criminal acts like Nolan's Joker for some time, i.e., a director of phenomena that reveal the fondness of a peaceful society for excess. Some of his "trials" are brilliant, and their borderline moral-ethical nature goes beyond ordinary political correctness. The fact that The Bridge is moving towards a "more conciliatory" motivation of the perpetrator is something like an expected tax, which does not spoil the pleasure of the chaos that "TT" is committing. What's more, the tax accounts for dizzying profits - a beautifully asymmetrical central duo with the jovial Kim Bodnia and the alien Sofia Helin (her Saga finally shed light on what is so sexy about Cumberbatch's Sherlock for some women), metrosexual light design and framing of shots that is chillingly beautiful and protects The Bridge from decaying into sentiment and genre clichés. Pure pleasure from the visual that is thought out to the last irrelevant shot (even the filler scene in which the detective gets out of the car and goes home is lit so that one sees how someone thought of it as an integral part of the whole), cold and withdrawn atmosphere, an interesting probe into the Scandinavian conscience and, despite its predictability, also a strongly emotional finale... If you even remotely like names such as Mankell, Nesbo or Larsson and sometimes tear-up at the BBC version of Wallander, then this has to be perfect for you. 2nd series: There are a few more awkward transitions and strange discrepancies, again repeating some of the purposeful work with side storylines (the characters and their destinies appear only as purposeful "complications" of the plot), but on the other hand, the creators learned this time and constantly maintain the tension and "global" perspective of the case. If the first series fell off a bit around the 7th episode, the tempo is constant here and the gradation paradoxically comes by moving to the intimate level of the characters. The ending is one of the best in the genre, there is a monstrous cliffhanger of the main plot, but the greatest strength brought to the narration is the repetition of the motif of revenge from the end of the first series. Jens, as the "legacy" of the first series, works great all the time, and while the dialogues and social "faux pas" of Saga and Martin no longer have the same intensity, the emaciated specter of "truth terrorists" pushes their relationship further to the bitter finale. I'm really looking forward to the next series, because the creators have shown the ability to maintain quality, not change the concept and at the same time move it forward. In addition, unlike Sherlock, Saga is not subject to the position of "antisocial superstar" and the more she opens up, the more human, imperfect and the less cool she is. In fact, she is quite annoying with her obsessiveness and in some respects she begins to evoke her colleague Lund.
()
(vähemmän)
(lisää)
Kuvagalleria (545)
Kuva © Danmarks Radio (DR)
