Ohjaus:
Ridley ScottKuvaus:
Dariusz WolskiSävellys:
Marc StreitenfeldNäyttelijät:
Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Charlize Theron, Idris Elba, Guy Pearce, Logan Marshall-Green, Sean Harris, Rafe Spall, Emun Elliott, Benedict Wong (lisää)Suoratoistopalvelut (4)
Juonikuvaukset(1)
Pari arkeologia uskaltautuu tutkimaan avaruusalus Prometheuksen kyydissä universumin pimeintä kolkkaa löytääkseen ihmiskunnan alkuperän. Kuten kreikkalaisessa mytologiassa, Prometheus haastaa jumalat, millä voi olla hirvittäviä seurauksia. Mikään ei voi valmistaa arkeologeja siihen mitä he ovat kohtaamassa. (MTV3)
Videot (39)
Arvostelut (13)
Prometheus has landed! The critics have spoken at length about the illogical behaviour of the characters and the unresolved jumps in the plot, so I will write something in its defence. Yes, those complaints are undoubtedly warranted and that’s a real shame, without those issues this film would be almost perfect, because everything except the script is very good. However, part of those flaws in logic could be excused saying that instead of a “team of methodological, 100% reliable and careful scientist” the expedition features “scientists driven by an inner desire for answers and discoveries”; some of the unresolved motifs can be easily guessed and some of the incomprehensible behaviour and weird details aren’t actually that impossible to understand, it’s just the viewers who don’t understand them (e.g. the behaviour of David or the settings of the medical equipment). And I also think it’s good that there are things left unsaid about the mythology, because thinking about a mythology on your own is A LOT of fun (BTW, the often used combo “Scott ruined the mystery around Alien” + “Scott didn’t explain anything” is logically contradictory). What’s left, and can by no means be excused (the scientists getting lost in the mapped galleries, etc.)… well, how you see it will depend on the type of viewer you are. If you demand films should be 100% coherent, with a clear theme that is addressed properly, and where all the questions are answered and all the motifs are addressed, tough luck. If, in contrast, you like a more open text, where the interpretations of and the musings over the meanings (or, rather finding the meanings, in this case :-D) are just as important, if not more, than the film itself, then you will know how to forgive Prometheus’s mistakes. Fortunately, I’m in the second group. /// The visuals are intoxicating, the ideas about the creator-creation relationship (because we can) are interesting, and the mythology, which only peeks behind the curtains, is even more interesting. 8.5/10 and relative satisfaction (!!!), though it certainly had more potential. PS: I want an extended version on DVD and in two years I want a sequel not written by Damon Lindelof :-D PPS: From a certain perspective, this film, together with its advertising campaign, is a brilliant package because it gives the viewers an experience very similar to the protagonist. Elizabeth joins the expedition to find answers to important philosophical questions. Her motivations are not mundane, she expects something like enlightenment (figure out who we are, why we came to be and what is our purpose). The campaign and the film’s first act prepare the viewer for sophisticated and uncompromising science fiction – a genre milestone. Elizabeth gets to the planet and, instead of finding satisfactory answers, she and the entire crew have “their asses kicked” by angry extraterrestrials. The viewer goes to the cinema and, instead of the intellectual sci-fi that was promised, they get brutal horror with notes of B-movie. It’s hard to jump in joy at this, but as a joke it’s good :-D
()
(vähemmän)
(lisää)
Alien was a film based on one simple premise (horror from the unknown), and the way Scott managed to play on a single emotion in a masterful form - paradoxically, the simplicity of the film ensured that the experience from it does not age for even a second - the horror and panic are captured in clear and virtuoso form. Prometheus is based on roughly three premises (the relationship of the creator - creation / faith / fear of the unknown), but none of them can even make it to the embryonic state. To put it bluntly: the script is awful. Half of the characters act as if they have just undergone a lobotomy, the metaphysical overlaps are resolved by repeating the word "faith", and the most human and best-written character is an android. The jump scares are cheap, as well as genre props (olms and a crab man, WTF?), there is a complete lack of the finesse with which the terror in Alien was composed from the a dense soundtrack and a masterfully composed image (some of the action scenes are pure routine)... On the other hand, I appreciate that even though Ridley is already noticeably running out of breath and ideas, Prometheus still has a magnificent artistic solution and your head spins from the giant scenes. In the end, I wondered if this film was needed in terms of the "aliens" of the series - the answer "about as much as everything after Aliens". So the answer is very little, or not at all. He answers the few questions with the help of cliché, and he doesn't open any new ones (even if he really wants to). The deep disappointment can be explained by the fact that the expectations were set elsewhere by the fault of the creators, i.e., something other than an "action horror B-movie with an A-movie design and a philosopher from McDonald’s". I will be mourning until July... [50%]
()
Prometheus is a pretty decent sci-fi, but at times it has almost fatal sci-fi related flaws. It begins at an amazing pace. The story is timeless, imaginative and it has a great pace due to the strange atmosphere. The second half is much weaker, everything begins to be a routine and the worst of all is, spoiler alert, the alien finale. That really pissed me off. Prometheus was supposed to be pure sci-fi with everything it entails and not the prequel to Ridley Scott’s Alien. The whole time it made a completely different impression and in the finale he turns it into this and thinks I will fall on my butt… I feel really sorry for that. Visually, it is absolutely amazing, and that also counts for something.
()
Spoiler impressionology! It's been exactly ten years, give or take a few days, since I saw the first Alien, the film that piqued my interest in cinema as a whole, and the question of what came before has actually been gnawing at me for a decade. So from a purely subjective point of view, I have no reservations about it because the film answered my questions. First of all, it confirmed that the aliens are a biological weapon that probably cannot be controlled by anyone. So far, so good. But when I look at it with hindsight, aided by a brief post-film debate, I don't quite understand why the writers had to break the film into survival horror in the second half, endowing the characters with the logic of incompetent teenagers. Visually, including Streitenfeld's excellent audio, there's nothing to fault it for (well, except for Weyland's mask, that's horrible) but there's not a single climactic scene, something that would draw me to the movie theater for a second screening. This is actually a huge shame because, for the first hour, Scott was creating a more interesting world than James Cameron has recently. After leaving the theatre I was ready to give it four stars, given that the marketing campaign had gone beyond me, but I thought about the film a bit too much during the twenty-minute journey home.
()
Pretend you’re going to watch Alien vs. Predator 3 without the Predators and you’ll be ecstatic. The first third is an absolute sci-fi orgasm – exciting, epic, atmospherically captivating, visually engaging, with attractive actors and a promise of great things to come. Everything here is so perfect down to every tiny detail that one wants to cry with happiness. Plus there are some nice ideas conveyed through the dialogue (and monologues). The second third slows the pace down and brings a more intimate tone when it tries to tell us more about the characters. The last third is hastily put together action horror with butchered editing and storytelling, which doesn’t elaborate on the originally outlined themes, and is ridden with genre clichés and Emmerichian heroism. Luckily, the closing scene setting up a sequel somewhat mitigates the disappointment. Fantastically shot piece of screenwriting crap. I feel cheated, Ridley.
()
Kuvagalleria (491)
Kuva © Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation / Kerry Brown
