[Rec] 2

If it had been made in Hollywood, I think of how overseas scouts liquidate talent, but Balagueró and Plaza have clearly liquidated themselves. The main trump card of the first film, the nagging feeling that all it takes is a little religious insanity for a similar situation to arise, is demolished by a series of backward explanations that kick logic in the head and destroy all tension. This is helped by stereotypical police SWAT characters, an utterly moronic trio of teenagers, and one absolutely "WTF?!" resurrection. It wasn't boring (although the lack of longer "steady cams" hurts), but it pissed me off (after half an hour permanently), and that's worse. 1 ½ stars for the bloody details. The rest gets both middle fingers up! (25.02.2010)

When I heard a spoiler some time ago about the acrobatics the creators had performed on the story of my favourite horror film, I began to feel quite scared. Unnecessarily so. Firstly, that information cannot be considered a spoiler (that the zombies aren’t zombies is revealed in the first few minutes). Secondly, the twist doesn’t feel at all forced, the events develop smoothly and the script as a whole feels well put together and purposeful, to the point that I’d be willing to believe the creators were counting on this sequel, even before making the first part. The last fifteen minutes of the first part made me feel deeply scared, which didn’t happen in the sequel (the adrenaline ride label is very accurate), but it still won me over thanks to its pace, the bloodiness, the more interesting plot (and its supernatural moments in particular) and the ending, which moves the story in a completely different direction. Looking back at it (initial fears notwithstanding), I’m glad that the creators weren’t afraid to change the subgenre of the sequel. We already had perfect zombie horror, now we have perfect action (censored) horror. In short, I enjoyed returning to that house in Barcelona and I’m looking forward to seeing it again. (25.02.2010)

Have you ever seen a baseball player during a baseball game? I mean the moment when he attentively watches the pitcher's movement, carefully prepares the bat, and calculates every fraction of a second of his decisive hit - to place the ball, zooming at a terrifying speed, right in your crotch. That's the feeling I had after a few shots of this horror spectacle, which film fans honored on FilmBooster. Not only that but in the following minutes, it seemed that the batter, frustrated by an unsuccessful hit, ran toward me with the bat in hand and delivered a series of painful blows to my most sensitive areas. I have no words for what happened on the television screen - well, no decent words. The expressions that come to mind are usually used when a hammer falls on my little finger or when my foot slides into dog excrement. The absence of any logic in the film characters. A screenplay that could have only been created as a joke or a cruel trick by filmmakers on the audience. A police commando, to be sent on an extremely important mission that reeks of a huge disaster, consists of members whose stupidity surpasses all limits, they must have been cast in a global casting call. The inhabitants of the house affected by the epidemic scream, wildly swing their arms, and without exception, do the last thing that would come to mind when facing a real threat. The constant instructions to use cameras to document what is seen here lack any logic, although this doesn't matter because practically everything lacks logic here. However, this dreadful experience raises the question of how sane I was when I gave the first film a rating of 3 stars. I must have been slightly affected by dementia or influenced by some chemical. Such a decline in quality is not possible between two parts and practically the same crew. Overall impression: triple underscore zero. (03.03.2015)

A bit weaker, though it goes at full throttle from the very beginning and immediately picks up the desperate and oppressive atmosphere from the end of the first part. The filmmakers obviously set out to kick the viewer's ass as much as possible, they made absolute morons of the main characters, driving them into bigger and bigger, more and more suspenseful and more and more disgusting shit, with blood splattering all over the place, one attack of bloodthirsty zombies followed by another, and heads blown off with shotguns being par for the course. Unfortunately, this spectacular and immensely entertaining ride is increasingly undermined by a stylistically mismanaged and nonsensical twist about Satan. If the directors had dropped it and stuck to the deadly virus and the zombies, I wouldn't hesitate to give it a full rating, because this film doesn't let up for a second and the spooky finale in the dark is once again perfect. It's a pity, but they just wanted to make the best possible starting point for the next sequel, the quality of which I already have big doubts about. (11.08.2011)

The first instalment escalated gradually, from zero to full-throttle horror trance that made even the toughest viewers sh*t themselves with fear. The second part picks up where the first left off so seamlessly that the film could be put together in a single whole. On a scale of 1 to 100, the pace of the second part starts at sixty and stays there until the climax, where it increases to eighty. You won’t relate to the characters much, as it’s an action-packed joyride full of 3D shoot-outs, running demons, cynical humor and sometimes too much camera shake, and in places, the characters behave so strangely that you can see that the filmmakers are actually making fun of them. You can feel from the film that it was created only thanks to the success of the first instalment, but at the same time it retains great creative trademarks and works with previous events so that fans do not end up upset or disappointed. Its only goal is to provide entertainment. In fact, it is a similar shift from a serious horror movie to an action flick as in the first two "Whatever" of the Dead Romero movies or Raimi’s Evil Dead movies. Paco Plaza and Jaume Balagueró are men in the right place and they did well in not trying to overshadow the film’s predecessor. I give four stars for the above-mentioned trademarks (in the hands of any other directors, the script wouldn’t stand a chance of getting more than three stars) and I am looking forward to the apocalypse in part three. Hopefully with Plaza and Balaguero. (10.02.2010)