The Postman - tulevaisuuden sanansaattaja

The current younger generation doesn’t even know this film exists. Perhaps like they don’t even see Costner as an erstwhile Oscar winner and big-screen superstar. The sweet nineties. This mega-flop was backbreaking for Costner’s career as a director and producer at the time, which is no wonder, as the film is dumb and naïvely affected. And watching such a film for three hours isn’t for everyone. But it paradoxically benefits from seeing it for the first time now, more than two decades later. Despite the aforementioned negatives, it is a fond recollection of epic movie adventures in which monumental natural exteriors played an important role and the wide-angle camera flew over crowds of carefully staged live extras and animals to the strains of James N. Howard’s majestic orchestral music. And that was with the crew’s passionate commitment to making the viewer experience possible by working hard outside in the actual wilderness. We don’t see any of that in big Hollywood movies these days. That’s why today, in my home cinema with a four-meter screen, I found The Postman soothing in a way – despite shaking my head and smiling at the things that happened in it. (31.10.2020)

An experience for a more hardened audience. Kevin seemed to like the character of the savior of the people, so he cut out his post-apocalyptic vision of American society, which is brought together by a postal deliveryman with a very sympathetic "turnkey dad" face, with absurd pathos and naivete. He's violently putting together a western and science fiction, and he's not good at it. At first I found it funny, but unfortunately the laughter became a disbelieving smirk after a while. This is how an advanced creative crisis manifests itself. I'd rather listen to songs about postmen a hundred times in a row than this manifestation of idiotic patriotism! (31.03.2004)

Postman Pat, Postman Pat, Postman Pat and his black and white cat... But Costner doesn’t have a cat. He has a horse that he rides for a full three hours all the way to where the sun doesn’t shine. And he’s headed that way from the very first shots. And, if his old nag hasn’t died in the meantime, he is still on his way to this day. My entire schooling went by more quickly than this embodiment of dragged-outness in its purest form. It seems to have been some allegory on the speed of the American postal service, because otherwise I have no idea what the filmmaker wanted to say. I hope that Kevin pulls himself together and films a sequel to this someday - it could easily be ten hours long. That would make better viewing than the daily footage of our House of Representatives. (15.09.2008)

It’s hard to speculate about why this legendary Kevin Costner flop became such a failure and literally a symbol of a film disaster. But there are several positive things to be found in it: sensible and perceptive direction, excellent action scenes (the sequence where the main female protagonist picks up the M16 and starts shooting indiscriminately is unforgettable), and even the core idea is not bad. Unfortunately, Costner did not do a good job writing the characters, and for example, Will Patton did not turn out well at all. There is no shortage of pathos, and unfortunately, it is at times unbearable, but it is definitely a film that does not appear on screens every moment, so it deserves attention, as well as recognition for the effort and reasonably well-done work, although it could have been much better. (30.07.2007)

This gets full stars, and from my point of view they are clearly deserved. It's a film that never fails to entertain me and that I can finish even if I watch it at eleven o'clock at night. I must have a thing for fairy tales or something. P.S. If Costner hadn't shaved, it would have been even better - the bearded image suited him perfectly and it was a great fit for the post-apocalyptic story... (20.09.2007)

I don’t remember when was the last time I fell in love with a film that is universally considered bad, and Postman, the king of cinema failures, almost managed it. With its patriotism, grandeur, predictability and naivete, Costner’s opus represents everything I often resent about Hollywood blockbusters, while at the same time is a clear answer to the question of what it is that I genuinely love about them. Even though it’s improperly long and dull at times, it didn’t bore me, I liked its vision of the future, the main villain was truly evil and Howard’s music is amazing. Moreover, Costner’s performance is good and, visually, the film is believable and nicely old-fashioned. It’s a real shame that due to some major nonsense and poorly staged sequences I can’t give it 4*, it would be truly improper. 70% (16.03.2020)