Saw

Gritty, violent, disturbing. The visuals and music are sometimes extremely brutal. Saw is superbly written and directed, but the acting is mediocre. A bit gratuitously shocking (for effect). The final twist is excellent! (26.03.2005)

This saw has really sharp teeth, though a bit rusty in places. Among the good things we can count the thick oppressive atmosphere, several excellent suspenseful scenes and one awesome jump-scare. On the other hand, there is the unconvincing performance of Cary Elwes as Dr. Gordon, a bit of the traditional clichés (the pratfalls or the pointless hesitation before blowing someone away) and the final twist. In itself, it is very, very surprising and shocking, but it is too much "for effect" and in hindsight it digs big holes in the logic of the plot. Still, I won't go below four stars, a film that can happily be described as a heavy punch for the average audience (a friend told me how he experienced a stampede to leave the cinema during a screening in Ireland) doesn't deserve it. (08.01.2005)

I’ve watched the first Saw six times already and it always makes my heart beat like a race horse in the last minutes. The sequels are considerably worse, but Saw is still one of the most complex and better horror series ever. (14.08.2007)

Come out and play, Mister... A whole lot for very little. You see, Saw is like FilmBooster where the room is substituted by the webpages and Jigsaw by POMO himself, who mixes everything up with his twisted sense of humor. He deploys an army of a thousand multi-accounts to stir emotions and turns users against each other. I bet now we can look forward to some final twist and tricks on ordinary people like deleting all of their scores and reviews. That would be a master stroke worthy of this atmospheric genre. (10.02.2022)

This basic premise was without the slightest clue of what I was getting into, and without the knowledge that I would see it countless times in future installments, it was really perfect back then. Despair, the unknown, and people in a strongly oppressive environment and situation still function today. It's a shame that with Jigsaw came the tormented cliché of "I'm aiming at you, but I'll wait until you take the weapon from me", because without it, Wan would have aimed really high. What the script loses here, it gains with the point. It may be problematic, full of holes, and perhaps even impossible, but it can't be taken away from it that it is truly unforgettable. The new Se7en may not have come then, but with a decade of hindsight and the presence of unbalanced sequels, the first Saw has matured into very favorable colors. 70% (03.02.2006)

The overwhelming majority of films from this area do not fall into the B-movie category, but rather the C-movie category and have a sadly semi-amateurish character. Saw significantly stands out from this production with its professionalism and is currently the actual peak of the genre. A relatively sophisticated screenplay, professional directing, editing, cinematography, and acting performances that do not provoke disdainful smiles. Along with the horror atmosphere, strongly naturalistic shots, and impressive ending, they create a perfect cocktail for Saw to become a box office hit. On the other hand, the screenplay is not so well-developed as to avoid inconsistencies and some clichés. The editing at times resembles music video production and flashbacks only delay the story. Overall impression: 60%. The sequels of this film have already lost the originality of their predecessor and are just squeezing money out of the pockets of the audience. (01.12.2007)

An atmospheric slaughter movie that I found surprising thanks to some of the twists. Great ideas put into practice well. Wan certainly knows his stuff. It was pleasant to see many well-known and quality actors alongside some unknown ones. But it isn’t so brutal and doesn’t make you jump, so don’t be afraid. ;) (02.02.2013)

Saw is nothing by very well and effectively filmed bloodbath. James Wan is definitely not a bad director, he is original, inventive, and dynamic, and for the most part, he manages to maintain an almost lethal pace throughout the entire film. The atmosphere and excellent screenplay save a lot, but I still can't help feeling that it is just cleverly written and effectively filmed ordinary nonsense. (16.02.2005)

I didn't need the epileptic camera none-sense and the metallic soundtrack, but I admit that Saw is a good horror film, certainly above average by current standards. But I only realized this because of the great, great, great ending - until then I thought I was watching a rip-off of Seven, in which the characters occasionally do horribly stupid things (blinding illumination, by lightning, for example). (11.01.2013)

A delight. The triumph is not so much the story itself, but rather its imaginative compositional structure – the uncompromising way it throws us into the plot, the brilliantly constructed atmosphere of hopelessness and physical danger, and the gradual uncovering of the past, which allows us to patiently, bit by bit, look deeper and deeper into the whole plot scheme and absorb its depressing atmosphere with an ever-increasing heart rate. The action-packed ending almost brings down the seriousness of the whole thing to the level of a furiously edited teenage murder mystery (comparisons with Se7en are therefore inappropriate in this respect and others), but the murderous, unpredictable twist puts a crown on a great script, which despite its exaggerated effect impressed me massively. An innovative and extremely entertaining game with proven genre elements and, among others, absolutely (for most of the runtime) amazing editing and awesome soundtrack... Content-wise, it has its flaws, but formally it’s 5* without any doubt. 85% (09.04.2012)

This is a very powerful, intense, and somewhat petrifying movie that everyone should watch to get an idea of how to play games in adulthood, if no one wants to play with you anymore, and if you are tired of playing board games like Ludo. Of course, you clearly cannot say that about the other sequels, as they lack the form and concepts of the first movie. (17.02.2009)

There are quite a few things that didn’t come together, the acting isn't the best, but given the filmmakers' enthusiasm, the budget, the ideas (viewing a room through a camera flash), and most importantly, the brilliant and formally bombastic ending, it deserves a buck. Too bad the sequels just ruin the name of this awesome thriller. (28.03.2005)