Barefoot

It has some magical moments that prove that Svěrák Jr. is a really good director. I appreciate the view of the war through children's eyes, but the story is too disjointed; it needed a unifying line. The story of Uncle Wolf, which was supposed to cement the narrative, isn't enough to pull the whole film together. It's a shame, I really wanted to love this film. (01.01.2019)

You know that you are watching a very well done film from the 2nd WW period, but at the same time you feel that there is basically no story. And I would be ok with that if only the character played by Oldřich Kaiser (who is getting better with every role) wasn’t made the most interesting one and basically holds the whole story together but then it is killed off in the most disgusting manner towards the end of the film. And this end was my biggest Czech movie disappointment in a very long time. (04.01.2018)

I wanted to like it so badly. I was ready to enjoy the expected heartwarming drama and vise-like kindness, but unfortunately I got a film where that is completely absent. In fact, there's almost nothing there. It looks nice, and as far as the production design and costumes goes, I can't fault Barefoot at all, but in all other respects it's wretched. And a mess. The film goes from nowhere to nowhere, and although it is framed by a period and bites into some interesting conflicts, eighty percent of the running time is ultimately completely useless. Trying to cram in as many "flashbacks" as possible results in there being no time for anything and because of that, the humor doesn't work, the drama doesn't work, and the poignancy doesn't work. Most of the time I felt like someone had dropped two minutes of a scene that should have been fifteen minutes long, and I have little idea why I should be watching the boys tackle a classmate, that Eda might get a slap on the wrist, that the dad is at odds with his brother, and that a pigeon has gone missing. There's never time to pay attention to anything properly and the result is such a nice looking film where there's an awful lot going on, but for most of it you'll probably ask yourself why you don't really care about any of it. Too bad. (22.08.2017)

The already abbreviated original looks more like an initial hint and outline for a much more extensive material, but it is saved by Sverak's language mastery and wrapped in a precisely matched captivating mix of a boy's mostly summer adventure full of smiling, every day and dramatic moments from growing up in the countryside during the occupation. It´s just a more dramatic variation on There Were Five of Us or Les récrés du petit Nicolas. Although the adaptation largely slavishly and with no context illustrates the scenes from the short story, but what is missing is a safety net made of kind humor and playful Czech language. In addition, there is no dramatic framework and, what is most reprehensible, is that a life vest in the form of a distinctive children's point of view through the adventures of “us, boys, who go out together and experience all kinds of adventures" is completely missing. The result is a nice and incoherent patchwork of better and worse fragments of scenes that is captured in a “watchable" way, nothing more and nothing less. (02.01.2019)

Filming is something Jan Svěrák hasn't forgotten how to do, but creating picturesque images and working with a retro atmosphere alone is not enough for a fulfilling cinematic experience. You also need a functional screenplay. I don't know why Jan didn't utilize his father's abilities, who is one of the best screenwriters of the last decades. Barefoot does not work, and when I use this term, I really mean it doesn't work from a dramaturgical standpoint. Even though Jan Svěrák fills his film with plenty of stuff, in the end, it is incredibly empty. You don't just need memories, you have to piece them together properly. This film is helped to a considerable extent by sentiment, but I won't assist it in that, as there are plenty of others who can. Overall impression: 45%. I can't help but have a reservation about Oldřich Kaiser's casting. Even though there is not a big age difference between Vetchý and Kaiser, the years when Kaiser was drinking heavily have unfortunately taken their toll on him, so he could actually play Vetchý's father. By the way, both he and Ondřej Vetchý are slightly too old for Tereza Voříšková and their little son... The scene by the pond, where Voříšková and Kaiser exchange a long, emotionally charged gaze, and in which it is evident that the director wants to evoke in the viewer the impression of either a platonic or fulfilled past relationship, brings to mind associations with pedophilia more than anything else. (17.09.2017)

A charming and picturesque story based on Zdeněk Svěrák’s book about the memories of his childhood. What more could you ask for? The ideal form of the ideal substance. It would make no sense to leave this project out of Jan's biography. This way, it’s just fine. (06.10.2017)

I find it hard to review this... I love the book and audiobook very much, it has the beautiful atmosphere of childhood memories, it's warm, and the little guy's view of big things in it is magical. Zdeněk Svěrák the writer was able to write it, Zdeněk Svěrák the actor can also tell the story... But while Jan Svěrák the director was able to film it, Jan Svěrák the screenwriter unfortunately couldn't tell it as well as his father. Hard to say if it was even possible... But some scenes should have been longer or should not have been there at all, some situations in turn definitely should have been shown to viewers so that they and Eda would not learn them only secondhand (we should have seen at least the “grandmother who was coming toward them" or “Péťa who flew off") and then it would have been more pleasant, more coherent. And I didn't understand the purpose of one change from the book, where the mom and Eda meet someone else at the pond. But just so I don’t complain so much, I must commend the actors (Ondřej Vetchý is particularly accurate, Tereza Voříšková, with a few exceptions, feels very natural, Oldřich Kaiser is a certainty, and Jan Tříska as well), the music by Michal Novinski, the believable period atmosphere, the nicely captured countryside and plot of reviving scenes of Eda's imaginations. Three and a half. (18.08.2017)

If you are a fan of Svěrák, you’ll survive Barefoot unscathed and even with a pleasant smile. It’s a cute, poetic view of the world through the eyes of a child that is too cute and too loosely poetic – the story lacks a core conflict that would help give shape to the characters and the pleasant episodes of life are supported by several sub-plots, but lack a solid frame and give the impression that they could last another hour. Other than Eda, the character with the most interesting story is Kaiser’s Wolf, the rest have a more or less subordinate position and guide the protagonist through a world driven mainly by family values and the beauty and pitfalls of boyhood, with the war taking a secondary role. It’s not a bad film, it has solid direction and several nicely delivered humour motifs, but the result is too shoddy and inconsistent. 65% (04.01.2019)

I was expecting to laugh a bit more, but the mood of the film was rather melancholy. I was okay with that as soon as I realized that this wasn't going to be one of Svěrák’s typical comedies, and I quite enjoyed the film. I really liked the atmosphere of rural idyll spiced up with war events. What I loved were the performances of Oldřich Kaiser and Tereza Voříšková and the film’s subtle humor. It was an incredibly relaxing and feel-good film. (06.03.2018)

The film didn't disappoint me outright, but I had hoped it would be even funnier, with more humor from Zdeněk Svěrák, but it's a bit weaker in that regard. As a nostalgic film, it works, especially thanks to the great child characters. The storyline revolving around the character of Vlk (Oldřich Kaiser) had much more potential within it. (20.08.2017)