Sintit Sopassa

Nemo has apparently not been found yet, otherwise I cannot explain why a film like "Sharks on Dry Land" was made. It copies so much from Pixar classics that it's not really nice. In addition, there are other films like "Shark Trap" or "Hen's Folly". Yes, I wonder what a film about sharks and other fish would take from "Hen's Folly". Well, it's actually the hens. This alone suggests that something is wrong with the film. And it is. There are so many storylines that it's unbelievable for such a short film. You follow so many of them that they become confusing and I think even your children won't enjoy it much. Many characters, most of them straight out of "Finding Nemo", others slightly original. Mentioned hens and octopuses. I won't go into the plot, although the main one is probably an attempt to get the eggs back. Not the son, but only the embryos. Everything fails because the animation is simply terrible and cannot make the bad, boring, and unnecessarily branching story more interesting. I know, one should be forgiving towards a Malaysian animation, but what's the point of making something ten times worse than films made almost ten years ago? When I say worse, I mean in every sense. An unthought-out story that wants to be grand and magnificent, but is unable to control itself. Animation where everything is like rubber or slime. Plus, I have never seen so many dull moments in an animation in my life. It's as if nothing really happens in some places and we are only watching the boring life underwater. But for that, you can just dive into a lake and you will probably experience more. A very unnecessary animation. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/07/mistrovsky-plan-nerdi-bel-ami-susi.html (24.02.2013)